Voices for Death Row Inmates Banner of Hope

Voices for Death Row inmates got together with London artist Carrie Riechadrt and came up with the idea of a Hankies for Hope banner ... this banner is made from cotton hankies .. hankies being something we wipe tears of sadness away with. During the time the death penalty was in practice in the United Kingdom, the judge when passing a death sentence would place a black hankie on his head as he did so .
Each hankie represents a soul , a soul awaiting their fate or already executed . The name, prison ID number and State is written on the hankie. There are also birds flying free. Bird cages ,hearts , angels , candl
es , leaves and flowers painted onto the banner, again all symbolic.
They have been stitched together with orange ribbons between each one , orange being the colour of oppression and the colour of the jumpsuit a death row inmate wears when being moved from one place to another ... so this banner is very symbolic in everyway
This banner has grown over the last few months …but we want people to add the names of their loved ones and pen pals to the Banner of Hope.

If you would like to add a name of an inmate who has been executed or is on death row please contact us via our facebook page or via our website
Below see our Banner of Hope SO FAR!! More names will be added soon


The Banner of Hope So far

Translate

Friday 10 May 2013

Robert Pruett Texas

Abolitionists, Yesterday there were news reports that Robert Pruett, the man who had been scheduled for Texas' 499th execution on May 21, had received a 60-day set off. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice's web page still has Pruett listed for execution on May 21. I just spoke with the District Clerk in Bee County where the McConnell Unit is located and where Pruett was housed when convicted of murdering a correctional officer, which landed him on death row. The District Clerk told me that Mr. Pruett's attorney, David Dow, made two unopposed motions yesterday, Thursday, May 9, 2013: (1) to put off the executions for 60 days and (2) to have DNA testing done on a palm print found on a piece of paper at the scene of the guard's murder. She said that the judge will have to have a hearing before the May 21st execution date in order to rule on those two motions. This is why there is not yet another execution date set. They are waiting for the judge to set a hearing and then rule. This judge ruled against extending the execution date just back in March when it was requested by another attorney representing Pruett Rihard Riogers III, of Corpus Christi. When I looked on the Bee County web page, I could find no judge named Ronald Yeager. It turns out that he is a retired judge and was brought in on this case. Senior District Judge Ronald Yeager sat on the bench, presiding over the 156th District Court, and gave Pruett the May 21 executions date after Pruett asked him to postpone it until August as there was new evidence in his case. His attorney couldn't specify what the new evidence was as it was being looked into by another attorney, presumably David Dow from the University of Houston Law Center. The clerk thought Judge Jeager was used in all cases involving the prison system. There are three state prisons in Bee County: the McConnell Unit (2984 prisoners), the Garza West Unit (2278 prisoners plus 400 at a work Camp) and the Garza East Unit (1978 prisoners). (Some background: Pruett was 15 years old when, on Aug. 9, 1995, he and his brother allegedly held down a resident of the trailer park where they lived in Houston while their father stabbed a man to death. All three of them were sentenced to life in prison. He was tried and convicted under the law of parties after he and his older brother were told to hold down the man his father murdered. Robert Pruett began serving his life sentence in October 1995, only weeks after the murder. He had just turned 16. At the time, TDCJ officials said he was the youngest prisoner in Texas’ adult prison system. At age 20, Pruett was charged with killing a guard at the McConnell Unit in Bee County in 1919 and got the death penalty. Robert Pruett's case is being handled by special prosecutors from the prison system and is in the court of Senior Judge Ronald Yeager.) Gloria Rubac (cell) 713-503-2633 (home) 713-225-0211

Thursday 9 May 2013

Howland woman asks top court to vacate her death sentence

The only woman on Ohio's death row asked the Ohio Supreme Court Tuesday to vacate her death sentence, citing errors made during an earlier resentencing. Donna Marie Roberts argues that the trial judge should have considered head injuries, her history of depression and other mitigating factors before again issuing the ultimate penalty for her role in the 2001 murder of her former husband. "What happened here is the court got reversed, got [its] hand slapped ... and did the bare minimum to just get it out of there as quickly as possible, and everything we requested to support [Roberts' case] was denied," attorney David Doughten said. But prosecutors, during oral arguments that lasted more than an hour, countered that Roberts had her days in court, evidence was presented, and the judge properly weighed and resentenced her to death. "Even though she stood before the court and talked for 18 pages worth of transcript, she never said to the court, 'Don't sentence me to death, I've changed my mind on this, I thought this was a good idea 5 or 6 years ago, I've changed my mind,'" said Assistant Trumbull County Prosecutor LuWayne Annos. "That was never stated to the court, not by Ms. Roberts and not by her counsel. At no point was there ever a plea for Donna Roberts' life at that second sentencing." According to documents, Roberts and her then-boyfriend Nathaniel Jackson planned the murder of 57-year-old Robert Fingerhut for months. Roberts provided Jackson with access to the Howland home she and Fingerhut shared, where Jackson shot the victim multiple times. Both Roberts and Jackson received death penalties and were resentenced on an earlier ruling from the Supreme Court, after it was determined that the prosecutor's office assisted in writing the original opinion in the case. Roberts also was not allowed to make an oral statement to the judge before her original death sentence was announced. Legal counsel for Roberts argued Tuesday that the trial court judge should have allowed additional mitigating evidence after the case was remanded. Among other arguments, Roberts contends the court should have considered that she was sexually abused as a child, spent time in a psychiatric ward, suffered severe head injuries from car accidents and received government assistance due to a mental disability. Justices voiced concern Tuesday that the trial judge did not make direct reference to Roberts' statement in his final decision, and they questioned prosecutors about whether that was grounds to reconsider the case. "This is a capital offense," said Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor. "The judge is required to create a sentencing entry, and there's certain things that have to be in it that indicate that the judge has met their responsibility when it comes to the weighing and balancing of the aggravating and mitigating circumstances. ... That's not here." Justice Judith Ann Lanzinger added, "What is concerning me... it seems as though the judge went back and just reviewed what had been done at the trial and specifically talked about the waiver at the trial ... and then prepared an entry talking about the mitigating and aggravating factors ... It seems as though the judge missed the remand." (source: Youngstown Vindicator)

New Website

Please take some time to look through Our New Website

Monday 21 January 2013

Contact us UPDATE

We have changed the link to this page slightly. Our contact details all remain the same. We have added a number so that people can TEXT us also.

Friday 18 January 2013

Honour Dr King and Say NO to the Death Penalty

Last year this great group marched or rode with the Abolition Movement in the MLK Parade. We handed out flyers, talked on the mic and honored Clarence Brandley who lost ten years of his life to the racist justice system in Montgomery County.
It still exists today. Montgomery County is still trying to execute innocent men. This time it is Larry Swearingen and he has an execution date for February 27. Nine forensic experts say Swearingen is on death row for a murder he couldn’t have committed, yet Texas courts won’t grant a new trial. We must stop it!
We invite you to join us this Monday at 9AM a couple of blocks east of Minute Maid Park on Texas Avenue near Chartres or St. Emanuel.
Call 713-503-2633 if you can't find us. Dress in layers as it will warm up to 66 degrees Monday and bring a snack. We will have water.
"As one whose husband and mother-in-law have both died the victims of murder assassination, I stand firmly and unequivocally opposed to the death penalty for those convicted of capital offenses. An evil deed is not redeemed by an evil deed of retaliation. Justice is never advanced in the taking of a human life. Morality is never upheld by legalized murder." -- Coretta Scott King

How many innocent people has the US executed?

As a report reveals the innocence of a man put to death in Texas in 1989, we examine the US' use of capital punishment. More than two decades after the US state of Texas executed Carlos DeLuna, an investigative study has revealed that he was in fact innocent. DeLuna was put to death in 1989 for stabbing and killing a petrol station cashier, Wanda Lopez, in 1983. Now a team from Columbia University claim to have proven DeLuna's innocence. James Liebman, a law professor, and his students say DeLuna's conviction was the result of a poor police investigation, unreliable eyewitness testimony and a weak defence. "There was no DNA that was ever found or used in this case. [The] team went to Corpus Christi in 2003 to try to get the physical evidence from the case to run a DNA analysis but that physical evidence had been checked out of the prosecutor's office and lost." - Shawn Crowley, the co-author of Los Tocayos Carlos Their report concluded that the murderer was Carlos Hernandez, a man who bore a striking resemblance to DeLuna. Over the last two decades support for capital punishment in the US has been on the decline. Nonetheless, despite the work of many groups that have raised questions about the fairness of the American justice system, around 60 per cent are still in favour of the death penalty. Today, there are more than 3,200 people on death row. So far this year, 18 people have been executed. But the number of death sentences is dropping every year, and more than a dozen US states have now abolished capital punishment. Death penalty opponents say there is no way to know how many innocent people have been executed in the US. Over the last 40 years, more than 130 have been released from death row. "If I was to rewrite the laws I would add many procedural safeguards against the possibility of making [an] error, like requiring DNA, changing the standard of proof from beyond a reasonable doubt to any doubt whatsoever and requiring a [competent] defence lawyer…." - Bruce Fein, a constitutional lawyer Nate Fields is among those exonerated inmates. In 2009, he was acquitted of a double murder after spending almost 20 years in prison, including more than 11 years on death row. Among other things, this is what Fields told Al Jazeera after reading about Columbia University's investigation into the DeLuna case: "The main reason why the death penalty should be abolished is because of the human factor and that is going to continue to play out as long as we have the death penalty. As humans we are going to make mistakes. Just because there are 12 people in the jury doesn't mean they can't get it wrong, they can …because of the human factor …. With the death penalty you can't bring a man back from the graveyard." So, what are the flaws in America's implementation of capital punishment? Joining presenter Shihab Rattansi on Inside Story Americas to discuss this are guests: Shawn Crowley, the co-author of Los Tocayos Carlos, the report that seeks to establish that Carlos DeLuna was innocent; Bruce Fein, a former US associate deputy attorney-general and a constitutional lawyer; and Richard Dieter, the executive director at the Death Penalty Information Center. "Most of our criminal justice system is based on plea-bargains and compromises but the death penalty once it's carried out can't be taken back, we have no room for error so it is a systemic problem as well as a procedural one." Richard Dieter, the executive director at the Death Penalty Information Center THE CARLOS DELUNA CASE: DeLuna was accused of killing a petrol station clerk, Wanda Lopez, in 1983. He was executed in Texas in 1989 A Columbia Law School report on the execution found significant problems with the conviction, particularly that it was based on the testimony of a single, unreliable eyewitness The report says another man had admitted to killing Lopez, that DeLuna had an ineffective defence lawyer and that he had suffered during his execution due to a problem with the injection The five-year investigation into DeLuna's case found him not guilty of the crime he was executed for, and suggested that police had botched the investigation THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE US: More than 3,200 people remain on death row About 60 per cent of Americans support the death penalty, although support has dropped in the last 20 years So far 18 people have been executed in 2012, while 43 people were executed in 2011 More than 1/3 of all executions took place in Texas, which has executed 482 people since reinstating the death penalty in 1982 Out of the 50 US states, 17 have abolished the death penalty China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Iraq conducted the most executions in 2011, the same year the US ranked fifth worldwide The US is the only Western country that imposes the death sentence Source: http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/insidestoryamericas/2012/05/2012518112115143387.html